The Big Reason Why Some Fans Think Liam Hemsworth and Miley Cyrus Will Get Back Together

More than a decade ago, one of Hollywood’s favorite love stories began on a movie set. What started out as actors portraying a fictional love story, quickly evolved into a real-life romance.

It seems that Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth were brought together by fate, which is one of the reasons why some fans believe they will ultimately end up back together. Their recent split hasn’t deterred fans from having hope.

Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth had simple beginnings

Cyrus and Hemsworth’s love story started on the set for Nicholas Sparks’ film The Last Song back in 2009. In the movie, they played a young couple falling in love.

Not surprisingly, the pair subsequently fell in love themselves. Cyrus has always emphasized that the pair were friends first and lovers later. Their relationship was built on a solid friendship which is why they have always worked so well together.

Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth’s ten-year relationship has had its ups and downs

In June of 2012, the couple announced their (first) engagement but after postponing their wedding the two officially told People they were calling it quits by September of 2013. Cyrus blamed the breakup on her youth, and her desire to seek out her own happiness.

“I don’t think I realized what 19 truly is, and I got engaged at 19, and I definitely wouldn’t change being engaged. It was so fun wearing a fat rock for a few years,” Cyrus told Barbara Walters. “But now, I just feel like I can actually be happy.”

By January 0f 2016, Cyrus is seen wearing her engagement ring again and the couple is back together. Their ability to ride the ebbs and flows of their relationship is definitely a testament to their friendship.

Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth had a short-lived marriage

View this post on Instagram

My love ❤️

A post shared by Liam Hemsworth (@liamhemsworth) on

Hemsworth captioned a sweet wedding snapshot on his Instagram simply: “my love.” That alone gives hope to fans that the pair will reunite. Their profound love story is reflected in their sweet wedding photos, even if their marriage didn’t last very long.

Cyrus and Hemsworth tied the knot in December of 2018 in a small, private ceremony. Unfortunately, less than a year later, Hemsworth filed for divorce.

Cyrus regularly explained that she wasn’t traditional marriage material and didn’t even like the word “wife,” which is probably part of the reason their marriage collapsed on itself. They’ve split before and reconciled though, so fans are hoping that its just a matter of time.

Liam Hemsworth still has photos of Miley Cyrus on Instagram

Despite their split and rumors that Hemsworth is already dating someone new, Hemsworth keeps photos of Cyrus up on his Instagram account. All of them.

From photos of their early relationship to a sweet shot from their wedding day, Hemsworth has kept them all up. Fans believe that this shows he still has a spark of hope they will reunite. Cyrus, however, has unfollowed Hemsworth and has deleted all evidence of him from her social media.

Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth’s relationship has always been on and off

The big reason which some fans on Twitter are holding out hope is the fact that the couple has always gotten back together, no matter how serious the break up has been. Aside from that, Cyrus herself commented on Twitter that she will always love Hemsworth.

That’s why fans believe that the lovebirds will ultimately get back together. Since they’ve bounced back from the many breakups of their youth to find each other again they simply are destined to be together.

In fact, sources close to the couple often have commented that the pair could easily get back together, as they have in the past.

“Their on- and off-again relationship is currently off,” says the source about one of the couple’s many previous breakups. “But you never know with Miley and Liam. They could be back on at some point.”

Fans are holding onto the idea that true love exists, as they wait for Cyrus and Hemsworth to, inevitably, announce they are back together.

Source: Read Full Article

Why Fans Aren't Happy Aladdin Star Billy Magnussen Is Getting a Spinoff Series

“Actual Aladdin can’t get an audition but the token white dude gets his own series?” one person wrote. “Haha f–k you, Hollywood. You’re racist.”

"Aladdin" star Billy Magnussen might be getting a Disney+ spinoff, but it’s not going over well with a lot of fans.

On Friday, The Hollywood Reporter announced that Disney is developing a spinoff series for their streaming service based on Magnussen’s character, Prince Anders, the royal suitor who vies to take Princess Jasmine’s (Naomi Scott) hand in marriage.

This could have been exciting for "Aladdin" fans, however, the news came just a few days after actor Mena Massoud revealed he hasn’t gotten a single audition since starring as the titular character in the live-action remake.

"I’m kind of tired of staying quiet about it," Massoud told The Daily Beast Tuesday. "I want people to know that it’s not always dandelions and roses when you’re doing something like ‘Aladdin.’ ‘He must have made millions. He must be getting all these offers.’ It’s none of those things. I haven’t had a single audition since ‘Aladdin’ came out."

Because of this, many people took to Twitter to share their anger over the fact that Magnussen, a white actor, might be getting a spinoff when he only appeared in a couple of scenes, when Egyptian-born Massoud was the film’s lead actor and can’t get work.

"Actual Aladdin can’t get an audition but the token white dude gets his own series?" one person wrote. "Haha f–k you, Hollywood. You’re racist."

"So the dude who plays Aladdin can’t get an audition but the one white dude with one scene in a majority brown cast gets his own movie," another added. "Certainly a great look Disney."

See how people are reacting in the tweets, below.

Source: Read Full Article

Why Lady Gaga Fans Are Trying to Cancel Billie Eilish

Hint: It has something to do with Eilish being vegan and Gaga’s iconic meat dress.

Cancel culture knows no bounds.

After a video of Billie Eilish, a known vegan, vaguely disapproving of Lady Gaga’s iconic meat dress went viral, the latter’s fans — called Little Monsters — took to Twitter to cancel the 17-year-old singer, using the hashtag #BillieEilishIsOverParty.

During the interview in question, Billie and brother Finneas were talking to Variety about their incredibly successful year, creating the chart-topper "Bad Guy" and Billie’s six Grammy nominations, which she humbly said was "an honor."

"I grew up watching the Grammys. We all did. We used to judge all the girls’ dresses. That’s all I did. I barely paid attention to the music…" she explained, as her brother interjected to wonder, "Was the meat dress a Grammys event?"

"Eee…yikes," Billie let out (around 3:15 in the video below).

To clarify, Gaga actually wore the dress to the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards, explaining that the garment "has many interpretations. For me this evening, if we don’t stand up for what we believe in and if we don’t fight for our rights, pretty soon, we’re going to have as much rights as the meat on our own bones."

"And," she added, "I am not a piece of meat."

Gaga explained she was also using the dress as a nod to a speech she had made, titled The Prime Rib of America, in which she urged the U.S. military to abandon its "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy, which discriminated against LGBTQ people.


However, the hashtag soon became a means for Billie’s fans to defend her.

"Dude I’ve been a Gaga fan since the beginning. & even I’m not mad at Billie Eilish," one person tweeted. "Y’all are just sad for trying to cancel a 17 year old VEGAN for her own opinions/beliefs. Like you think Gaga was bothered by all the opinions back then, let alone now?"

Another added, "Gaga fans really out here saying vile shit about Billie cuz she said Gaga’s meat dress was weird. Breaking news: IT WAS F–KING WEIRD and we spent a solid year roasting her for it," while a third wrote, "yall wildin over a VEGAN not liking a MEAT dress. did you know vegans dont eat animals?"

View Photo Getty Lady Gaga Celebrates Haus Laboratories Launch

Hot Photos

Solo Hailey Bieber Stuns at Calvin Klein Event In Germany

Frozen Stars Honored with Star on the Walk of Fame

Caitlyn Jenner's Wild I'm a Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here! Experiences

OITNB Star Danielle Brooks Welcomes Baby Girl

The Ultimate Influencers Kim K and Tyra Attend the 2019 Influencer Awards

Jessie J Strips Down to Her Calvins for Unsponsored Snap

Travis Scott Shares Photos of Baby Stormi Rocking 'Daddy's Hair'

Beyonce's Iconic Coachella Look Is Unveiled at Madame Tussauds Las Vegas

The Stars of Knives Out Step Out for the Film's LA Premiere

Rihanna SLAYS the Red Carpet at AFI Fest Queen & Slim Premiere

Pierce Brosnan's Sons Dylan and Paris Selected as 2020 Golden Globe Ambassadors

Brooklyn Nine-Nine Was Renewed for Season Eight

Danielle Staub Admits to Having This Cosmetic Surgery

Every Must-See Red Carpet Look from the 2019 CMA Awards

Awards Week in Nashville Kicks Off with the 2019 BMI Awards

Demi Lovato Appears to Go Instagram Official with New Man

Baby True Is Adorable as Khloe's Mini-Me in This Iconic Look

Charlize, Ava and Yara Among Honorees at Glamour Women of the Year Awards

Shawn and Camila Sat Courtside But Didn't See Much of the Clippers Game Last Night

Amber Portwood Shares Sweet Birthday Tribute as Daughter Turns 11

Girl Power Was Strong at the Charlie's Angels Los Angeles Premiere

Michael Jackson's Oldest Kids Celebrate 60 Years of Motown

Millie Bobby Brown Rocks New Look at Stranger Things Season 3 New York Screening

Dream Kardashian Turns 3 — See How The Family Celebrated!

Source: Read Full Article

Why every woman should have a midlife hair rebellion

Like so many others, when SARAH VINE turned 50 she resigned herself to short, sensible hair. Then she thought to hell with that: Why every woman should have a midlife hair rebellion

  • Sarah Vine, 52, has suffered from androgenetic hair loss since her teens
  • In her mid-40s, she began using Intralace, a very fine mesh lace with human hair 
  • She explained her decision to opt for a long hairstyle as middle-aged rebellion

Men are not the only creatures prone to the occasional spot of middle-aged rebellion. Most women my age (52), and particularly those who are pre- and post-menopausal, experience it in some form.

For example, one of my best friends went off and had a cartilage piercing in her upper ear. For a few days, she was all cool and pleased with herself, until it went septic and she ended up in hospital on a drip.

Another friend ran off with her yoga teacher, while another sold her business and is retraining to be a shaman.

One of my very oldest and dearest has decided to renovate her late aunt’s remote house in Ireland, single-handedly and with no previous experience.

Her husband, rather gloomily, says she is wasting her time — mostly, I suspect, because it means she’s no longer around to cater to his every whim. She, meanwhile, has never seemed happier.

Sarah Vine, 52, (pictured) who uses Intralace due to androgenetic hair loss, explained why she’s opted for long hair as middle-aged rebellion

As for me, well, I’ve gone and got new hair. Ridiculously long, glossy, flicky, just-stepped-out-of-the-salon, because-I’m-worth-it, every-possible-cliche-you-can-think-of hair.

As midlife crises go, it’s perhaps not the most extreme. But it is fairly ridiculous.

Conventional wisdom has it that long hair after the menopause is much the same as leather mini-skirts, biker boots and winged eyeliner: guaranteed to make you look like mutton dressed as lamb. Once, I would probably have agreed.

Still, I don’t care. I absolutely love it.

Now, I should say that I do have a bit of an excuse. I suffer — and have suffered all my life since I was a teenager — from androgenetic hair loss, which in men is known as male-pattern baldness. This means that the hair on the crown of my head is very fine and sparse.

For many years, I simply wore it in a short crop and made the best of it.

But, in my mid-40s, the problem had got so bad I could no longer disguise it.

I investigated wigs, but found them really uncomfortable and itchy. And, besides, I found the act of taking off my hair at night profoundly embarrassing and depressing.

A hair transplant was out of the question, not just because of cost, but because I would have needed at least two or three to get the required coverage. But, after further research, I happened upon a woman called Lucinda Ellery, an alopecia areata sufferer who has devised a simple, but very clever, system called the Intralace.

Essentially, a very fine mesh lace sits over the affected area and is secured permanently in place using your own hair. Panels of human hair are then attached to the lace.

The whole process takes around five hours — and the results (as you can see above right) are pretty impressive.

Sarah (pictured before) spent years convincing herself that she loved her short, cropped hair because she felt that she had no other choice

I’ve been wearing this system very happily now for a number of years. I can sleep in it, swim in it, go to the gym in it and wash it at home, and it lasts a good couple of years before it has to be replaced.

And so it was that a few weeks ago, I went in to have a new one made.

And that’s when my midlife hair crisis struck. The extra panels of hair, you see, are about a foot long. Once everything is in place, I normally have the entire ensemble cut into a sensible, middle-aged lady journalist style.

But, this time, as I watched those glossy brown tresses being stitched on, something inside me just thought: ‘Oh, s** it. I’m keeping it long.’ I have spent years convincing myself I love my short, cropped hair, for the simple reason that I had no other choice.

But I was lying. I’ve always secretly wanted lovely, long swishy hair, like the stuff I had before it all fell out. And now I’ve got it.

Admittedly, this has happened about 30 years too late — but I don’t care.

I’m too busy enjoying my rebel hair, too excited by the possibilities of it and the fact that people keep telling me how young it makes me look.

(There is a practical side, too: it’s keeping me warm when I take the dogs to the freezing park in the mornings.) Besides, there are worse forms of midlife rebellion. In a world where everything seems so very uncertain, not to mention toxic and more than a little bit scary, hair is one of the few things women can actually control.

Perhaps that’s why more and more of us are beginning to experiment with it.

Sarah (pictured) said long hair is as crazy as it gets for her and her daughter loves it, advising her to go blonde next

Think of Helen Mirren, who recently has started matching her hair colour to her frocks; actress Miranda Richardson, who likes to wear hers a peachy-orange; and Emma Thompson, whose hair has become a kind of canvas for whatever whim she is having at that moment.

If you don’t fancy sherbet-coloured hair, there is always the rebel cut. Or, to be precise, the undercut.

As popularised by actress Tilda Swinton, they are becoming increasingly common among yummy mummies at the school gates, lending an edgy twist to more conventional styles.

Hair down and you can be every inch the corporate wife; hair up and you might just pass for a pop star.

But, for me, straightforward long hair is as crazy as it gets. The reaction from friends, family and colleagues so far has been mixed.

My son hated it at first — mostly because, at 15, he hates anything that might conceivably draw any attention to my actual existence.

My daughter — who herself has long hair that varies in colour from platinum to purple and the occasional dubious shade of green — loves it and thinks I should go blonde next (nb: I will not be going blonde!).

Sarah (pictured) revealed long hair has boosted her confidence, her old hair made her feel almost naked

Yet perhaps what’s most remarkable about it is the way that it makes me feel. After all, it’s only hair — how can it make any real difference?

But it does — and how. It has boosted my confidence tenfold, not least because it now obscures quite a lot of my face. And, as well as feeling more confident, I feel more secure.

My old hair used to make me feel so vulnerable — almost naked, if that doesn’t sound too melodramatic.

With long hair, I am, for the first time in my life, visible in a good way, rather than in a ‘gosh, look at her hair, isn’t it awful’ sort of way.

For the first time, I understand why women such as Jane Seymour, Jerry Hall, Joely Richardson, Joanna Lumley and Elizabeth Hurley all maintain stubbornly long tresses, in direct contravention of the unwritten rule that says women over 50 should get the chop.

At a time of your life when you feel distinctly unfeminine — middle age, children growing up, the menopause — and when tradition dictates that you should fade discreetly into the background, rebel hair is a distinct act of defiance.

It’s a way of showing the world that, yes, you may be a little on the vintage side, but no, that does not mean you’re ready for the scrapheap.

So what triggered our daring new ’dos? 

By Jill Foster 

Taz Thornton, 45, (pictured left) went for a vibrant pink after getting bored with her usual blonde style. Steph Nimmo, 51, (pictured right) transformed her hair after losing her husband to cancer

Taz Thornton, 45, is an author and business coach. She is married to Asha, 51, and lives in Lincolnshire.

When I was younger, I hated pink. I thought it was insipid and girly. I’d always been blonde and, when I worked in a high-powered job as a director in publishing, I had a shoulder-length bob.

I was sitting in the hairdresser’s chair when I had my epiphany. ‘I’m bored,’ I complained, and my stylist asked, half-jokingly: ‘Fancy going pink and shorter?’

I said: ‘Go for it!’ When she revealed the final colour, a vibrant pink, I was delighted. I’ve loved it ever since.

Society always wants to put women in a ‘box’ and tell them what they should do, particularly when they are older, so this felt rebellious. I’ve since been various shades, from bright magenta to baby pink, and I get nothing but positive reactions.

I can’t imagine being any other colour now. I’ve made it part of my personal brand for my work as a life coach. It’s a visual reminder of how much I’ve changed and how far I’ve come.

Steph Nimmo, 51,  a writer, lives in South- West London with her three children.

I’d had the same old boring ‘mum bob’ for years and, as I approached my 50th birthday, I knew I wanted something a little bit different.

I lost my husband, Andy, to cancer when I was 47 and I didn’t want to fit into the widow stereotype — i.e. safe and serious.

The decision to go for an undercut came to me out of nowhere at the hairdresser’s one day. At first, it felt so liberating, and physically so much lighter. But it also made me feel younger, more rebellious and ‘relevant’.

I love the fact that I can be ‘sensible Steph’ at meetings, with my long hair over the shaved area, and ‘rebel Steph’ when it’s tied up (pictured).

If other women do notice, they are often envious. Some say they wish they were brave enough to try it.

Since I had the chop, I’ve also changed other things about my look. My dull clothes are gone and I now shop at Zara, H&M and & Other Stories. I’m only 51, so why not take some chances?

Source: Read Full Article

'Queer Eye': Why Tan France Was So Anxious He Couldn't Sleep for the First Few Weeks of Filming

Tan France serves as the fashion expert on Netflix’s Queer Eye. If you’ve seen the show, you’ll know France always has it all together: the look, the vibe, and duh, that fresh ‘do. France can smooth out a crease on a French-tucked shirt while calmly guiding his makeover subject through a clothing crisis, without losing his chill (or his fresh look). However, no one can be that cool all of the time. France admitted in a recent radio interview that he dealt with intense anxiety in the first few weeks of filming the Netflix reality show.

Tan France’s reaction to being cast on ‘Queer Eye’

France was a guest on Terry Gross’s NPR show, Fresh Air in September. He told the host how he reacted to getting cast on Netflix’s Queer Eye.

“I screamed,” he said. “I didn’t think I could do it.” The style expert said he was terrified. France was raised in England by his parents, Pakistani Muslim immigrants. He knew how big a deal it was.

“The thought of being one of the very first openly gay South Asian men on a major show … that pressure was so hard to handle,” he said.

In the age of streaming, the new Netflix show was a lot of pressure for France

France says of Queer Eye, he “knew it was going to be a major show.” He could see that Netflix had a “global marketing strategy.” The whole cast was aware Queer Eye would be pretty huge, France explained. That just made it scarier.

“The pressure of being one of the first to do something is massively stressful and difficult and anxiety-inducing,” he continued. All of this put a lot of stress on the brand new television personality to represent his community well. It was so bad, France said, it “kept [him] up at night everyday … for the first few weeks of filming the show.”

“I was wracked with anxiety and guilt thinking I’m about to destroy my community or the perception of my community,” he told Gross. With so few Muslims, and especially gay Muslims, represented in popular media, the weight of that burden felt heavy on his shoulders.

“I may not portray them in a way that they may be happy to be portrayed,” he said he worried at the time. He didn’t want anyone to think, “‘this is not a true representation of our culture.”

Tan France worried most about his family

“I was worried about the people that I know and love being attacked by people within our community,” France continued in the interview.

Members of his community, he told Gross, might be “concerned that my family have a gay man.” And, as France admits, he is very publicly and “very unabashedly gay.” He said that “could be problematic.”

“In our culture, you don’t represent yourself, you represent your family,” France explained. “When you are sinning in their eyes. you’re bringing shame to their community.”

But when Gross asked France if being gay went against his faith, he declined.

“I reconciled that when I was a child,” France said. “Thankfully I had belief in the god that I was raised to believe in. The Queer Eye star says he believed in a god that “was the most peaceful and most loving.”

Source: Read Full Article

Smart curtains, and why I’m banned from testing gadgets at mum’s house

At their best, smart home gadgets either make your home more accessible or help you with those little things you forget to do before sitting down with a hot meal. At their worst, they break stuff that was already perfectly fine.

I don’t need smart lights, but my dream is to have good quality smart blinds. A bit more than a year ago I moved into one of those inner-city apartments where all the external walls are windows, which seemed like a great idea until summer came and I realised we couldn’t have air conditioning.

At 2.30pm every day, the west-facing windows turn from being a TV tuned to today’s episode of Nobody Knows How to do a Hook Turn into one of those experiments your sociopathic neighbour did with magnifying glasses and ants.

While I’m usually pretty good at closing the curtains in time, it’s easy to get caught up in work or forget to do it before a meeting, and find the living room unable to serve its primary purpose. So, automating the blinds to close as it starts to get too hot is The Dream.

There are a few different ways to achieve this goal. The most straightforward, of course, is to just replace the old dumb blinds with new smart blinds, where the wiring is all integrated and the motor is in the shaft.

After you get the quote for doing that, followed by the doctor’s bill for treating your heart attack, you realise that it isn’t actually a good option unless you’re renovating or need to replace the blinds anyway.

Beyond that there aren’t many local options to sell you a ready-made device to get the job done, but online retailer Oz Smart Things does sell two different small motors you can attach to the chain that drives your blinds.

The Oz Smart Blinds option for retrofitting your curtains is affordable, but don’t use it with heavy blinds or metal chains.

The Oz Smart Blinds branded option is the more affordable at $170. If you buy a separate hub you can set schedules or control it via voice using Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant. Or you can just press the button on the unit or included remote.

Unfortunately my blinds are too heavy for this unit, despite being in the recommended size range. So I went and tested the unit on the blinds in my mother’s apartment, and that’s how I learned that it’s not compatible with a metal chain. The turn is too tight and the motor will bend and snap the chain. I am now banned from testing things at my mother’s apartment.

However, this story has a happy ending. The other motor, the Soma Smart Blinds Shades ( $230) has enough grunt to open and close my blinds. The unit is small and surprisingly quiet. It manages to be quiet because the blinds move at a glacial pace, but speed is unlikely to be a priority.

The Soma unit is more heavy duty and has a rechargeable battery.

The unit’s battery claims to last up to three months, and doesn’t take long to recharge, or you can use it plugged either into the wall or a small solar panel which sticks to your window. The solar panel sounds nice in theory, but does block more of the window than I'd like.

It helps if you can install it on a wall with a stud, because the act of opening the blinds requires some tension, particularly if your blinds are inconveniently heavy. But using multiple 3M adhesive strips has so far been reasonably effective on the metal uprights between each of my windows.

You need to buy the separate Soma Connect for $130 if you want to connect your blinds to your network and control them with Siri, Google, Alexa or other apps. If you don't, the only way to control them is through Soma's app, so if you can't find your phone you can't move the blinds. Although the app knows what the temperature is outside, you can’t set the blinds to close automatically at, say, 25 degrees, or sunrise. You can only set it by time.

There are definitely some kinks to work out when it comes to retrofitting smart blinds, but if you don’t mind a lack of buttons, the Soma is your best local choice.

Source: Read Full Article

Why Knicks aren’t closer to scapegoating David Fizdale

If David Fizdale is going to be made the scapegoat by Knicks president Steve Mills for his hodgepodge roster, it’s going to take a little while longer.

According to an NBA source, Monday’s 44-point blowout loss in Milwaukee did not put the Knicks coach in any immediate danger, as bad as the optics were. Fizdale, though, must still show a modicum of progress as the winter deepens.

The Knicks host Denver on Thursday and Indiana on Saturday before a grueling four-game western trip that begins with Carmelo Anthony’s Blazers in Portland.

There could be plenty of embarrassment ahead — as if their worst 21-game start in team history (4-17) isn’t bad enough.

With a seven-game losing streak, Fizdale is far from safe to make it to the All-Star break. But management was encouraged by the Knicks showing progress during that second 10-game stretch during which they recorded a 2-8 mark after also going 2-8 in the first 10.

After that 2-8 start, Mills staged a wild postgame press conference that essentially put Fizdale on alert.

The season’s third 10-game segment could not have opened any worse — blown to bits by the Bucks, who have a league-high 12-game winning streak.

Fizdale can’t afford many more egregious losses, but for now team brass looks at the Milwaukee Massacre as, according to a source, “a one-off.’’

The Knicks were playing the second night of a back-to-back, facing the Eastern Conference favorites and were without their two best defensive starters in Frank Ntilikina and Marcus Morris.

Still, it was alarming performance, with Fizdale acknowledging “we didn’t come in with an idea we could beat this team from the beginning.’’

That was a damning comment and perhaps the first sign of players losing confidence in themselves. That eventually will lead to Fizdale’s undoing.

The Post has already reported the major deterrent to make a coaching change this early is the alternative is unappetizing. Plus, Fizdale has two years left on his pact.

An interim replacement of either Jud Buechler, Caleb Kanales or Mike Miller, their former G-League head coach, would be hard pressed to make this convoluted roster sparkle. If Fizdale goes, he likely will take his top assistant, Keith Smart, with him.

Fizdale was stunned at the Milwaukee mess in which the club fell behind by 47 points. The Knicks had gone toe-to-toe twice against the Sixers, losing second-half 17- and 16-point leads, and they nearly upset Boston on Sunday, squandering a late six-point advantage.

Management’s concern is whether the coaching staff can strategically figure out a way to snatch close games in the fourth quarter. But without a designated closer, it will be difficult for Fizdale to do so.

Rookie RJ Barrett is not ready for such a prominent last-minute, go-to role, and the Knicks realize Julius Randle has never been a No. 1 option.

Still, Fizdale needs to be better and the lottery picks need to progress. Fizdale’s record as Knicks coach stands at 21-82.

Fizdale had a glorious reputation in Miami as a beloved assistant coach and did well for one season in Memphis (43-39). Then he fought with his star player, Marc Gasol, during his second season and got fired after an 7-12 start.

The $74 million question is whether Fizdale has enough to work with. Mills spent $74 million on free agents for this season.

“It’s a combination,” one NBA personnel man said. “Fiz looks to be a better assistant coach — not a head coach. He needs to understand how not to be everybody’s friend.”

Firing Fizdale this soon would also make Mills and general manager Scott Perry look awful. The duo tabbed Fizdale over 10 other candidates, including Bucks coach Mike Budenholzer. And they failed to interview Steve Clifford or Frank Vogel.

How could they be so wrong about Fizdale after raving about him as a magnet for free agents and connecting well with millennial players?

Mills is becoming aware this roster might not be the one to snap the six-year playoff drought, but the brass is thankful about its cap flexibility. Six free agents were signed to one-year deals, so the franchise is not trapped.

Even Randle’s two-year guarantee is a movable contract, especially next season, if needed for a future blockbuster trade.

Beginning Dec. 15, all seven of the Knicks’ free agents signed last offseason are eligible to be traded. If the season continues to go off the rails, management will reconsider and attempt to trade some of its veterans such as Morris, Elfrid Payton, Wayne Ellington and Bobby Portis for draft picks.

Not that any — save for Morris — has enhanced his trade value. Payton has been out the last 17 games with a hamstring strain, but is expected to be cleared for his first full-blown practice Wednesday and could dress against the Nuggets on Thursday.

The point-guard situation is an issue. The Knicks lack the true floor general needed to perhaps unlock guys such as struggling Kevin Knox, Mitchell Robinson and even Randle.

“Fiz needs a point guard to really be successful — the way he wants to play,’’ one NBA assistant coach said.

For more on the Knicks, listen to the latest episode of the “Big Apple Buckets” podcast:

Source: Read Full Article

Why Drake Would Never Actually Date Kylie Jenner

Drake is already over Kylie Jenner. Jenner/ Kardashian relationships usually start and end pretty quickly, but this has to be a record. Fresh off of her breakup from rapper Travis Scott, Jenner had been seen hanging out with Drake a few weeks ago and rumors quickly began to swirl that the two were doing more than just flirting. But now, sources have said that Drake no longer wants to date Jenner.

Why did Kylie Jenner and Travis Scott break up?

Jenner and Scott broke up in early October, leaving fans of the couple shocked. Most sources chalked the breakup up to the two being in different places in their lives.

“Kylie is young, but she really wants the traditional family life,” a source told Entertainment Tonight. “She has seen her older sisters with big families and multiple kids and she wants the same. She loved being at home with Travis and their daughter, Stormi Webster, more than anything. But right now, their priorities are different.”

“It was hard for him to be coming home every night to be with the family and putting Stormi to bed.” the source continued. “That’s not where he is in his life. It made Kylie insecure and anxious. The last few months, Kylie felt they were drifting and she was never really sure what was going on.”

Drake and Kylie Jenner start hanging out

Drake and Jenner were first seen together at his 33rd birthday party.

View this post on Instagram


A post shared by champagnepapi (@champagnepapi) on

“She spent the most time near Drake and his friends,” a source told Us Weekly of Jenner at the party. “Kylie was rapping to songs and dancing with her friends while she was next to Drake, but they weren’t dancing together. They seemed to have a connection though.”

In the beginning, the two just wanted to keep things casual between them.

“Drake has always had a thing for Kylie and it’s mutual,” a source told the outlet. “They hang out here and there and have been more recently than in the past because Kylie is technically single right now and the two of them live so close to each other.”

Drake doesn’t want a relationship with Kylie Jenner

Unfortunately for Jenner, Drake no longer wants anything romantic with the makeup mogul.

“Drake has definitely moved past any type of romantic feelings towards Kylie and it’s purely platonic between them at this point,” a source told HollywoodLife.

View this post on Instagram

u get the best of me

A post shared by Kylie ✨ (@kyliejenner) on

But Jenner is apparently okay with this new development.

“Drake feels like he’s on good terms with Kylie and he believes they’re on the same page in terms of where things stand between them now,” the source said.

Ultimately, neither one of them wanted to let things between them get messy.

“Drake would never want to upset Kylie or any of the family that he has known forever so that is why he wants to cool down any and all of the romance rumors,” another source told the outlet. “Drake is not going to make anything uncomfortable with Kylie, he’d never want to deal with the repercussions if they would become an item and then break up. He’d rather quit pursuing anything while they are still great friends.”

Source: Read Full Article

'90 Day Fiance': Why Emily Didn't Know if Going to Russia for Sasha Was 'Worth It'

Emily Larina and Sasha Larin, who are currently appearing on Season 7 of TLC’s 90 Day Fiance, met and fell in love in Larin’s home country of Russia. Not long afterward, Larina got pregnant with Larin’s now one-year-old son, David, and the pair got engaged.

The couple has raised eyebrows among 90 Day Fiance viewers, in part because little David is Sasha’s third child by a third woman. What’s more, 29-year-old Larina, who originally hails from Oregon, is 31-year-old Sasha’s third wife. Some fans wondered if Larin would be faithful to his third wife, or if his tumultuous romantic history made him a liability.

On the Dec. 1 episode of 90 Day Fiance, “We Need to Talk,” Larina opened up about the couple’s struggles in the early days of parenthood. She shared her worries about Sasha’s commitment to parenting and her challenges with postpartum anxiety.

Sasha let Emily down after their baby was born

After a difficult labor in a Russian hospital that ended in an emergency C-section, Larina shared her relief at welcoming her new baby to the world. “Finally, baby David is here!” she shared on the episode. “He’s so beautiful.”

What’s more, the 90 Day Fiance couple’s K-1 visa was finally approved after a long wait. “I’m so happy, the process is finally over,” Emily gushed.

Despite all the reasons to celebrate, though, not all was well. “If you ever have a child in a former Soviet country, please please please do your research,” Emily advised.

She explained that Sasha didn’t apply for their son’s Russian passport when she asked him to, so they were on hold for months, leaving them in limbo and unable to move to the U.S. during David’s first months of life.

“It doesn’t seem like it will ever, ever end, but there is a finish line in sight,” the new mom said wearily. Needless to say, “It’s been tough,” Larina admitted.

Emily claimed Sasha spent almost no time with David

Larina explained that, especially in a foreign country, parenting was an “isolating” experience for her at first. Larin’s demanding work schedule as a personal trainer for multiple clients at an area gym left her as the sole caregiver for little David.

“It’s been really hard, because it’s been 100% me taking care of the baby,” the 90 Day Fiance star admitted. “Sasha’s been at work all the time. He’s gone from 5:30 am until 11:00 at night.” She added that they hardly had any time together as a couple anymore.

The grueling schedule left Larina feeling conflicted about her move to Russia, especially in light of the fact that she was Sasha’s third bride-to-be. “One of the reasons I wanted to have him in Russia instead of waiting for the K-1 visa is because I wanted Sasha to bond with him, you know, when he was a little baby,” she explained.

“I wanted David to know his father, but…nope. Sasha maybe spends five hours a week max with David, so I don’t know if it was really even worth it,” admitted the 90 Day Fiance star.

The ’90 Day Fiance’ star worried about parenting with Sasha in the U.S.

The 90 Day Fiance couple also didn’t exactly see eye to eye when it came to spending one-on-one time with David. Emily said she was worried that Sasha would allow their little one to spend too much time in his bouncy chair and wouldn’t bond with him enough when they arrived in the U.S. and she had to work.

“When we get to America, Sasha is going to have to take care of the baby while I go out and look for work,” Emily explained, looking concerned. “He has had other children, but he doesn’t really know a lot about the child-rearing. He has always been the one working while his ex stayed home with the baby.”

“It makes me sad because he should be happy to spend time with our baby,” added Larina.

But Larin didn’t agree and thought his American fiancee was getting too worked up, especially because he already had two children. “I think Emily is worrying about [the] baby too much,” said Larin. “I don’t think I deserve this.”

Still, it looks like Emily and Sasha might be doing well now. She took to her Instagram stories after “We Need to Talk” aired to defend her statements about feeling isolated during the postpartum period.

The 90 Day Fiance star also said that, while Sasha’s work schedule had been hard for her during the early days of parenting, she was grateful that he had provided for them financially during that time.

Source: Read Full Article

Who is Laura Pidcock and why was the Labour MP criticised on LBC?

LAURA Pidcock is the Labour Party candidate for North West Durham.

Here's what we know about the Shadow Secretary of State for Employment Rights.

Who is Laura Pidcock?

Pidcock was born in North Shields, North Tyneside in August 1987 and raised in New Hartley and Seaton Delaval, Northumberland.
Her parents were both active in politics with her mum Mary being a social worker while her dad Bernard was an office manager who sat on Northumberland County Council from 2008 until he died in February 2019.
She studied politics at Manchester Metropolitan University, and was a mental health support worker before working at anti-racism charity Show Racism the Red Card.
Pidcock was a councillor for Cramlington Eastfield ward on Northumberland County Council, losing her seat to the Conservative Party candidate in the 2017 UK local elections.
That same year she was selected to stand for Labour in North West Durham, when the previous MP, Pat Glass stood down and was elected in the following election.
On 12 January 2018, she was appointed Shadow Minister for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

In 2019 Pidcock announced at the TUC that the next Labour Government would create a Ministry for Employment Rights to “bring about the biggest extension of rights for workers that our country has ever seen to deliver better wages, greater security and give workers more of a say over how their workplaces are run".

Why was the she criticised on LBC?

She was criticised for laughing at Nick Ferrari's line of questioning about their workers' policy on LBC.

Pidcock was on the radio to discuss Labour's plan to expand workers’ rights, reiterating their plan to ban zero-hours contracts and introduce a £10 minimum wage.

In announcing their Workers' Manifesto, Jeremy Corbyn called out what he called the UK’s five worst employers – Amazon, Uber, Asda, Sports Direct and outsourcing company ISS.

But when Ferrari put to her the possibility that forcing employers to pay almost 25% more could well lead to job losses, Pidcock laughed.

Ferrari pressed: "Why is it funny? People's jobs might be on the line. I don't see why that's funny."

To which the Labour candidate said: "Honestly, this is quite hilarious.

"I'm interested in why you are not pursuing the line of questioning about the minimum wage…"

People on Twitter were unimpressed and piled in with criticism.


Source: Read Full Article